A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours above the construction of a wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide focus subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods report about René Collier and also the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, find to create their relatives household. The case is becoming emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, where growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by creating a wall past the boundaries in their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Exclusive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as a result locations are matter to strict controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the correct place. Their legal team has characterised the motion as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal setting up disputes, exactly where sights of the sea are each really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced in the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-high h2o during a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods, an image which includes since become emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they were being meant to Assemble visual evidence of the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the drinking water for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the positioning became Just about the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely observed that this sort of steps were cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered in detail via the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just trying to develop a family residence in accordance With all the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches on a Particular Region of Conservation and say that each one performs have been carried out determined by Specialist advice and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean throughout a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around construction of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for the problem that a lot of observers see as significantly widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation among non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become additional contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier noted which the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in local advocacy on setting Rene Collier and Paul Feely up and environmental troubles, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from really distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances and René Collier waded via midsection-substantial water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal solution.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court need to establish whether or not the wall as created complies with setting up permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Location of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and scheduling problems. Yet the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other extensive after the authorized expenditures are actually paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental issues such as environmental protection and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre from the dispute stands partially created, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal thoughts. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the court’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.