A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier and also the Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development functions at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, request to develop their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, notably inside of a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced during the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, a picture which has given that turn into emblematic on the intensity of the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were meant to Get visual proof with the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the website turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely noted that these types of actions ended up cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second while in the authorized timeline.
For the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of arranging paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting alternatively that it is about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got described their long-standing relationship to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just looking to build a relatives residence in accordance Using the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are carried out depending on Specialist information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly frequent. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in local advocacy on scheduling and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very distinctive professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times have become synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waist-significant h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with each other very long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties including environmental security and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.